The role of technology in developing thematic learning evaluation tools at Junior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52366/edusoshum.v4i1.98Abstract
Rapid technological developments have had a significant impact on various aspects of education, including the development of thematic learning evaluation tools in junior high schools (SMP). This article explores how technology can be used to increase effectiveness and efficiency in thematic learning evaluation at the junior high school level. On the one hand, technology offers great opportunities such as automation of assessments, deeper data analysis, and increased interactivity and student engagement. However, on the other hand, the challenges faced include the availability of infrastructure, the readiness of teachers and students to adapt to technology, as well as issues of data privacy and security. This article provides a comprehensive overview of existing challenges and opportunities, as well as offers recommendations for optimal use of technology in evaluating thematic learning at the junior high school level. The development of the current technological era has helped many fields, especially education. One of those affected is the evaluation part of learning. Learning evaluation tools have emerged as a result of the integration of technology. This paper aims to reveal the potential and obstacles to developing thematic learning evaluation tools in the future. The method used in this research process is qualitative, library type. Data collection uses documentation techniques and data analysis using the Miles & Huberman method, namely: data reduction, data display, and conclusion. Data shows that there are several potentials and challenges using AI, VR, & AR technology in learning evaluation.
References
Akbar, A., & Noviani, N. (2019). Tantangan dan Solusi dalam Perkembangan Teknologi Pendidikan di Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pgri Palembang, 2(1), 18–25.
Alfalah Riski. (2023). Menjadi guru di era society 5.0. Open Society Foundations (OSF).
Ariatama, S., Adha, M. M., Rohman, Hartino, A. T., & Ulpa, E. P. (2021). Penggunaan Teknologi Virtual reality (VR) sebagai Upaya Eskalasi Minat dan Optimalisasi dalam Proses Pembelajaran Secara Online Dimasa Pandemik. Semnas FKIP, 2, 1–12.
Asrul, Saragih, A. H., & Mukhtar. (2022). Evaluasi Pembelajaran.
Copeland, B. J. (2023). Artificial Intelligence.
Enung Nugraha. (2009). Alat-Alat Evaluasi Pendidikan. Tsaqofah, 07(02), 239–247.
Fauzi, M. F., Fatoni, A., & Anindiati, I. (2020). Pelatihan Peningkatan Kualitas Evaluasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Berbasis Information Dan Communication Technology (Ict) Untuk Pengajar Bahasa Arab. Jurnal Terapan Abdimas, 5(2), 173. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.25273/jta.v5i2.5620
Feltham, E. (2023). Ketahui bagaimana ClassVR dapat meningkatkan keterlibatan siswa di dalam kelas.
Haenilah, E. Y., & Surahman, M. (2016). Desain Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Pendekatan Ilmiha di SD. Bandar Lampung: CV. Anugrah Utama Raharja (AURA).
Latip, A. E., Suparman, A., & Nadiroh. (2021). Difusi Inovasi Pembelajaran Tematik. Jakarta: UNJ Press.
Magdalena, I., Oktavia, D., & Nurjamilah, P. (2021). Analisis Evaluasi Sumatif dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Siswa Kelas VI SDN Batujaya di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Arzusin, 1(1), 137–150.
Mahfud, H., Purnama Adi, F., Widianto Atmojo, I. R., & Ardiansyah, R. (2019). Peningkatan Kompetensi Evaluasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Pada Guru Sd Di Kota Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 1–5.
Namira, D. (2021). Alternatif Media Evaluasi Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Android Menggunakan Google Formulir di Sekolah Dasar Plus Tahfizhul Quran ( PTQ ) Annida. Faktor : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan (2021), 8(1), 114–123.
Nata, A. (2016). Metodologi Studi Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Pasla, B. N. (2023). Perbedaan Virtual reality dan Augmented reality.
Rahmawati, F. (2022). Pembelajaran dengan Virtual reality Bangkitkan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence. 2010 The 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering, ICCAE 2010 (Pearson) (Vol. 4). Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAE.2010.5451578
Samsu. (2021). Metode Penelitian. Jambi: Pusaka.
Setyawan, B., Rufii, Nf., & Fatirul, A. N. (2019). Augmented reality dalam Pembelajaran Ipa bagi Siswa Sd. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 7(1), 78–90. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v7n1.p78--90
Setyo, D. (2023). Implementasi kecerdasan buatan dalam penilaian siswa.
Siyoto, S., & Sodik, m. ali. (2015). Dasar Metodologi Penelitian. Literasi Media Publishing.
Sukadari, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Tematik Bagi Anak Berkebutuhan Khusus Di Sekolah Luar Biasa Kelas Rendah. G-Couns: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 4(2), 339–351. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.31316/g.couns.v4i2.820
Sulhan, A., & Khairi, A. K. (2019). Konsep Dasar Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar (SD/MI). Mataram: akultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Mataram.
Wandini, A. S., & Lubis, F. Y. (2021). Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran secara Daring pada Belajar dari Rumah (BDR) jenjang Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP). Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 1985–1997.
